|
Send an e-mail to your senator, and there is a growing likelihood
that it will first be read by a computer system called EchoMail.
The program, developed by EchoMail Inc., Cambridge, Mass., sorts,
analyzes and even answers some of the e-mails sent to companies such
as Kmart
Corp., American
Express Co. and Calvin Klein Inc. Now, after two years of pilot
programs, more than 30 U.S. senators have installed it under a deal
signed by the Senate sergeant-at-arms.
EchoMail (http://www.echomail.com/) was
founded by V.A. Shiva, 37 years old, who sometimes calls himself
"Dr. E-Mail." The company's program is designed to improve corporate
responsiveness to e-mail by automating the processing. It recognizes
preprogrammed key words and their synonyms and can even tell if the
writer is angry, tipped off by exclamation points and such phrases
as "I hated your product" or "please send me a replacement."
Some customers use it only to sort mail and route it to the right
person, but many say it is smart enough to respond to most of the
regular e-mail and to forward to humans the things it doesn't
understand.
In the Senate, at least, most e-mails from constituents still get
a glance from staffers. But "that's not going to last for long,"
says Sen. William Frist, a Tennessee Republican and technology
enthusiast. He says EchoMail is good enough to categorize most
e-mails and send appropriate responses.
![[V.A. Shiva]](WSJ_com/tj_radar11142001213025.gif) V.A.
Shiva |
Responding to constituents' calls, letters and e-mails occupies
30% to 60% of the staff time in many offices, says Richard Shapiro,
executive director of the Congressional Management Foundation, a
nonprofit group that advises congressional staffers on running their
offices. The group, which is urging congressmen to deploy EchoMail
or other automated services to sort e-mail, says Congress last year
got 80 million e-mails, five times as many as the paper letters.
Do constituents care that their e-mails weren't read by a
congressman or aide? Mr. Shapiro says that in focus groups with
constituents, "people understood their communications weren't from
the member. They wanted responsiveness on a timely basis. They
didn't care whether it was staff or whatever."
David Archambault, president of B3 Corp., Sherman Oaks, Calif.,
which runs Internet promotions for companies such as AOL
Time Warner Inc., its majority owner, and Bank
of America Corp., uses EchoMail to reduce customer-service
costs. "I read about Shiva and tracked him down. I became enamored
with the technology," Mr. Archambault says.
EchoMail estimates that a company using humans to reply to all
e-mails spends $6.25 a message, while EchoMail can cut that cost in
half, including the cost of humans for the messages EchoMail can't
handle.
When a client such as Warner Music is running a compact-disc
sale, "Questions about a promotion become very similar: How long is
it running? What are the terms and conditions?" Mr. Archambault
says, "We've trained it to respond to hundreds of questions. It's
smart enough to tell us when it's got something it can't
answer."
Mr. Archambault says that as new questions arise, B3 trains
EchoMail just as it would an employee. "We had more inconsistency
with our live service reps," he says. In his tests, he says,
EchoMail answered as much as 95% of all e-mails correctly.
EchoMail isn't without rivals. With 125 employees, including 30
developers in Mr. Shiva's native India, it competes with larger
firms, such as Siebel
Systems Inc., San Mateo. Calif., and Kana
Software Inc., Palo Alto, Calif., that make software for
customer-relationship management and have an e-mail component
designed to help customer-service representatives respond to
e-mails. Electronic-billing companies also automate handling of
e-mail. And many companies design their Web sites with forms that
customers fill out to minimize free-form e-mails that computers
can't understand.
When e-mails arrive, EchoMail sorts it out and immediately
deletes random "spam," or unsolicited pitches.
The remaining e-mails are put into what Mr. Shiva calls the
"digital refinery." There, they are analyzed and forwarded to the
right department, or sent replies.
EchoMail also keeps a log of what topics generate the most
e-mails and the percentage of angry e-mails.
EchoMail generally operates as an application service provider,
hosting the e-mail on its own servers and charging customers 50
cents to $2 for each message handled, depending on the amount of
processing the customer contracts for. For other customers, it
licenses the software for $200,000 to more than $1 million.
When Mr. Shiva, then a graduate student at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology's Media Lab, started the company in 1995, he
initially raised money from angels in the advertising community.
Later, personal-computer maker Gateway
Inc. of San Diego made a $10 million investment. Mr. Shiva says
EchoMail is profitable now and doesn't have any immediate plans to
go public.
Companies sometimes start using EchoMail because they are
inundated with mail on a topic. Kmart bought EchoMail last spring
when it was starting to deal with letters protesting its decision to
stop carrying handgun ammunition. Since EchoMail batches together
e-mail by key words, "we get them quickly to the appropriate
department," a spokeswoman says. Similarly, when Nascar driver Dale
Earnhardt was killed, EchoMail sorted e-mail from customers who
wanted to buy memorabilia from Kmart, she says.
Write to William M. Bulkeley at bill.bulkeley@wsj.com |